All News & Blogs
Libi Uremovic May 18, 2013 at 04:11 am
good for them.....they should hold the conference in ib....the rest of the world would realize…Read More they've got less problems than they thought....
Frank H. Robles May 15, 2013 at 06:44 pm
Good Luck...!!! Hope the best for your efforts, enjoying the waves in Encinitas...!!!
Dr. Sue May 18, 2013 at 07:21 am
Rebecca.....the "christian" girl, who killed an innocent child and cowardly committed…Read More suicide, staged it to appear as a murder, on her sugar daddy's property; attempted to send a fk-u message to her sugar daddy, but failed. Everyone who mattered, was aware of her actions. She will remain burning in hell.
Dr. Sue May 18, 2013 at 07:15 am
Funniest lie yet! HA!!! Rebecca a "beauty"????? Flat faced doper who had control issues…Read More and violent behavior who killed an innocent child???? She resembled Jodi Arias, with her temperament, except Jodi Arias is much prettier. Rebecca was ugly. Sounds more like you have a fetish for dead nude corpses.
Rebecca will continue to be referred to as the "flat-faced doper who bludgeoned an innocent child and committed the world's most bizarre suicide"
Winston Dion April 14, 2012 at 01:47 pm
@Kate
Your comment is very likely what took place. She was beaten, stripped, bound and gagged.
Joe St. Lucas May 16, 2013 at 09:33 pm
What I'm saying is that if someone complained while the students were filming the video on school…Read More property, THAT'S harassment. Watching a youtube video where "twerking" is in the title is like having a video that says "naked body parts" in the title and saying "Umphh, I'm offended that I watched a video that showed skin." JUST CHANGE THE CHANNEL!!! DON'T WATCH IT!!! If they played this in the school on a tv in the main office area where unsuspecting folks could see it, that's a legitimate sexual harassment case.
Now, the "humping a wall" is kind of silly. I think it's stupid but if this is the worst thing they've done, cut them some slack. They probably won't do this again. Strange that the video is still up on youtube so apparently the lords of youtube don't see it as being extreme.
My opinion is that the school is embarrassed, the kids used school equipment to film it, and the school can't think of anything legitimate to chastise them so they're going to label them as sexual deviants, a charge that will be on their permanent record. Suspending them for two days is fine. They deserve some punishment for filming using school equipment on school grounds (unless the person who gave them the camera was a school employee and knew what was going on, in which case he/she should be suspended for a month). Hopefully their parents are giving them more grief than the school ever could.
Now if one of them had eaten a pop tart into the shape of a gun, we could have locked them up for life!
Tom Yarnall May 16, 2013 at 12:10 pm
At what point does public exposure become indecent?
Is humping a wall considered an artful…Read More expression with free speech implications? Is this the level of morality we want our children to express and be exposed to?
I have no answers, just questions.
Joe St. Lucas May 16, 2013 at 11:49 am
I don't understand this "sexual harassment" thing. Who was harassed? The students making…Read More the video wouldn't complain. If you watched the video on youtube, you "volunteered" to watch it. If you saw the video on TV, the TV station should be responsible for showing "harassing" material. That's like going into an F-Street bookstore (RIP) and claiming you're harassed by what they sell.
Real Estate Wrap-Up: 2 Shores Condos Snapped Up
0 Recommend Jennifer Vigil (Editor)