This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Health & Fitness

Coronado Corruption: City Officials Misappropriated Funds

City officials in Coronado, CA misappropriated millions of dollars from the Bridge Toll Revenue Fund that were intended to help Corridor residents who live on and between Third & Fourth Streets from the Bridge Toll Booths to Naval Air Station North Island (NASNI, or North Island). 


The Situation 


According to the city’s Balance Sheet dated June 2012, there was approximately $ 10 million left in a Special Use Fund called the Bridge Toll Revenue Fund that’s intended specifically for Corridor residents

By way of background, I’ve been the sole champion for over 3 years to stop Coronado city officials from misappropriating the public money in this Special Use Fund. During numerous city council meetings I’ve constantly reminded city officials that we must use Bridge Toll Revenue Funds to help Corridor residents instead of improperly spending this public money on other projects.

As I've consistently stated over the years, the Corridor bears the brunt of Coronado traffic because it's the most popular one of only two ways onto our island. Also, the Corridor is the direct route to the largest employer in town -- the North Island military base. As a result, it's especially egregious to misappropriate special use funds intended to help Corridor residents cope with the negative impacts of traffic.

Some of the examples I've given over the years for the proper spending of the public money from the Bridge Toll Revenue Fund are: to directly assist Corridor residents with things like double pane windows, insulated roofing, noise reducing shrubbery and protective property fences that don’t enhance noise in the Corridor.

The Basic Facts 


Here are the facts about the misappropriation of Bridge Toll Revenue funds:

Click here to read my 25 June 2013 www.DailyCoronado.com article. It explains exactly how, according to the plain language of the June 2000 Settlement Agreement between Coronado and SANDAG resulting from an earlier lawsuit, the Bridge Toll Revenue Fund is intended to be used only in the Corridor to help Corridor residents with problems caused by the removal of the bridge toll. Some of those problems are increased traffic, increased noise and increased air pollution due to increased vehicle emissions. None of those problems include drainage because by its nature toll removal can't cause drainage problems. 

Click here to read the 19 July 2013 SANDAG Transportation Committee minutes where a vote was actually taken in San Diego to further misappropriate the Bridge Toll Revenue Funds away from Corridor residents and divert them to non-Corridor projects. Coronado officials had decided behind closed doors, in violation of the Brown Act and against the city’s legal duty of transparency, that they want to spend this public money meant for Corridor residents on other projects that violate the controlling original Settlement Agreement.

Click here to view the video of the 15 October 2013 Joint Meeting of the Coronado City Council & Coronado Redevelopment Successor Agency. Scroll down on the right and click on agenda item 11b titled Acceptance of the Psomas Design Recommendation Report Regarding the Pomona Avenue, Seventh Street, and Adella Avenue Intersection Improvement Project. There are so many words in that title and yet the word roundabout isn’t one of them!

Slide the time cursor under the video screen over to minute 00:12:08 and listen until 00:16.30. During this 4 minutes and 22 seconds, you’ll hear my line of questioning during what is called the question and answer period of this agenda item.

In this same 4 minute and 22 second period of question and answer you’ll also hear, in response to my questions, how entitled city officials misappropriated the Bridge Toll Revenue Fund away from Corridor residents and diverted it to other projects around town, in violation of the original Settlement Agreement. City officials — both city staff and those elected to city council — cavalierly refer to their 19 July 2013 misappropriation of funds in bureaucratic code language by calling it “an amendment to the RTIP at SANDAG.” RTIP means Regional Transportation Improvement Program. The RTIP in question was adopted at SANDAG in 2012.

Government Oversight is Needed


Under the same 15 October 2013 council meeting video, slide the timer cursor over to 1:21:40 and listen during what is called the deliberation period of this agenda item where I explain the lack of government oversight which could have prevented Coronado officials from misappropriating the Bridge Toll Revenue Fund. Obviously, government oversight is necessary because Coronado city officials can’t be trusted to do the right thing.

The SANDAG Meeting in Question


Here are some additional facts about that 19 July 2013 SANDAG Transportation Committee meeting:

This action at the SANDAG level is legally questionable and risky for several reasons. Some of those reasons are: Coronado officials intentionally shut out all Coronado residents, including Corridor residents, from the process by failing to hold a public meeting and discussion in Coronado. Coronado officials also failed to give notice to Coronado residents about this major change of special use funding that was pursued and achieved at a SANDAG committee meeting held outside of Coronado. 

By taking this risky action to circumvent the public process in Coronado, city officials carelessly exposed all Coronado taxpayers to legal liability for damages to Corridor residents arising from the misappropriation of the Bridge Toll Revenue Fund in violation of the original Settlement Agreement

Who is Responsible for the Misappropriation?


The list is long:

(1) Those who voted YES at the 19 July 2013 SANDAG Transportation Committee meeting to approve of Coronado city officials misappropriating the Bridge Toll Revenue Fund by spending it outside of the Corridor or on non-authorized projects in the Corridor:
  • Mike Woiwode, primary Coronado SANDAG rep appointed by the Coronado mayor,
  • Al Ovrom, Coronado MTS rep and secondary Coronado SANDAG rep appointed by the Coronado mayor,
  • Tom Smisek, Coronado Airport Authority rep and former Coronado mayor, and
(2) Those with prior knowledge of the planned misappropriation at the SANDAG committee meeting, who shut out Coronado residents, and who green lighted the pursuit of the “RTIP amendment at SANDAG” in a back room deal:
  • Casey Tanaka, Coronado mayor and tertiary Coronado SANDAG rep by his own self-appointment,
  • Blair King, Coronado city manager,
  • Johanna Canlas, Coronado city attorney, and
  • Other city officials with who helped in various ways to get the Bridget Toll Fund misappropriation item prepared and onto the SANDAG agenda.
(3) Coronado elected officials who voted YES on Coronado budget plans over the years, which include the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP lists clear as day, in black and white, the misappropriations of the Bridge Toll Revenue Funds for other projects. So the mayor's and council members' YES votes on the budget plans also rubber stamped the misappropriation of Bridge Toll Revenue Funds to fund other projects:
  • Casey Tanaka: Coronado mayor,
  • Al Ovrom: Coronado councilman,
  • Mike Woiwode: Coronado councilman,
  • Richard Bailey: Coronado councilman, and
  • Other city officials whose job is to direct and oversee the annual preparation and presentation of the budget documents in our council-manager form of local government.
All of the above individuals intentionally acted against the best interests of all Coronado residents, especially Corridor residents.

How Did They Get Away with It for So Long?


For those individuals who question how city officials got away with misappropriating the Bridge Toll Revenue Fund for so many years before further misappropriating the Fund at the SANDAG Transportation Committee meeting of July 2013, the answer is open and obvious — the Coronado budget process.

For over 3 years, I’ve been crystal clear — both on and off the record — as to why I’ve voted NO on our budget planning documents, which include but aren’t limited to the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). Coronado budget planning documents are blueprints for:

  • Overspending because they plunge the city further into financial distress by growing the city’s enormous off-balance-sheet debts as well as other financial problems and waste about which I’ve been speaking and writing for years, and
  • Misappropriation of funds because city officials finance projects through the Bridge Toll Revenue Fund that they are legally prohibited from doing. Here are some of the projects that the mayor and councilmen voted YES to finance through the misappropriation of Bridge Toll Revenue Funds over the past few years: drainage project on Orange & Sixth, drainage project on Third/Fourth & H, and the Pomona roundabout.

Anyone wishing to discuss this matter further may contact me at bdenny@coronado.ca.us or 619-522-2637. I’ll always be happy to hear from you and answer any questions. If I don't know the answer, I'll find it for you.

Find out what's happening in Coronadowith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Avoid Additional City Wrongdoing 

Keep informed about how your city spends your tax dollars so you can demand that city officials, who work for YOU, avoid government overspending, waste and misappropriation of funds.

Read DailyCoronado.com, the Insider's Guide to Coronado City Hall, for financial facts and more. Click here

Find out what's happening in Coronadowith free, real-time updates from Patch.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?

More from Coronado